The Scientista Foundation
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Team
  • My Campus
    • Find My Campus
    • Start A Chapter >
      • Chapter Application
      • Chapter Application (In Progress)
  • The Periodical
    • Career Blog
    • Plan Your Education
    • Lifestyle Blog
    • Women in Science News
    • DiscovHER Science
    • Get Inspired
  • Events
    • Events
    • Symposium 2019
    • Symposium Testimonials
  • Join
    • Subscribe!
    • Internships
    • Test Membership
  • Sponsorship
    • Our Sponsors
    • Sponsor Scientista!
    • University Membership
    • Donate
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Team
  • My Campus
    • Find My Campus
    • Start A Chapter >
      • Chapter Application
      • Chapter Application (In Progress)
  • The Periodical
    • Career Blog
    • Plan Your Education
    • Lifestyle Blog
    • Women in Science News
    • DiscovHER Science
    • Get Inspired
  • Events
    • Events
    • Symposium 2019
    • Symposium Testimonials
  • Join
    • Subscribe!
    • Internships
    • Test Membership
  • Sponsorship
    • Our Sponsors
    • Sponsor Scientista!
    • University Membership
    • Donate
Search by typing & pressing enter

YOUR CART

3/23/2018 1 Comment

The Legally Blonde Movie and how Femininity can Define Strength

By Lidiya Angelova

Movies reflect our lives and biases. Since the birth of the movie business, men are often represented as strong, decision-makers and women stand in as weak, secondary characters, unable to deal with anything other than supporting the lead. Even with the rise of the gender equality movement in the movies and its carryover into reality, inherent biases remain in which females that demonstrate intelligence and strength are viewed as more masculine.
 17 years ago, a Hollywood romantic comedy questioned all of these biases. In this movie, an attractive woman decides to go to the famed Harvard Law School. Not only is she accepted (despite no one believing that she can get in), but she rises to the top of her class – all while keeping her feminine traits. It's one of the most empowering female-oriented movies of the 21st century and it was a success because many women, including myself, saw themselves in Elle Woods: the nice-looking, kind, but unstoppable woman who knows what she wants. A woman who could be a lawyer or a scientist while wearing pink (and fashionable clothing!) It is not only one of the rare female-oriented comedies, but it exposed issues like:

• the bias against physically attractive women, who are accepted only as a talking decoration
•  the idea that looks can't determine who you are as a person
•  how harsh the backlash from society can be when you don’t conform to what’s expected of you


The movie is back in the spotlight again thanks to journalist Lucy Jane Ford, who while interviewing the Legally Blonde actress Reese Witherspoon, gave Reese her dissertation that she wrote four years ago entitled “Dumb Blonde Ambition: Legally Blonde, Postfeminism and the Reimagination of the ‘Strong Female Character’.”

The video of Reese accepting the dissertation went viral. In response, many women shared that indeed Legally Blonde was an inspiration for them to follow their dreams, despite the societal expectations that beautiful and feminine women can’t also be smart and strong. The 'Legally Blonde' conversation highlighted a strong female character who’s multidimensional and acts like a human. Some women also shared that they wrote dissertations or essays about other unusual role models, like the Hollywood actress Grace Kelly, the former Spice Girls singer turned successful fashion designer Victoria Beckham, and the independent middle-aged girlfriends from ‘Sex and the City’. The interview clip opened the discussion about the idea that only you can truly know and determine your values and what’s important to you. Strong personalities come in different shapes. When someone embarks on different path than expected, that person should receive support, not harassment. And just like in the movie, real life women can be good friends and support each other.
Picture

Do you have an unusual role model or have you written about it? Tell us in the comments.

References
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legally_Blonde
https://twitter.com/lucyj_ford/status/973572079000915968

Picture
About the Author
Lidiya’s curiosity about “how life works” led her to complete a Master’s degree in Biology and a PhD in Microbiology. She worked as a researcher at the National Institute of Health in Rockville, MD, USA and is currently a science communicator and writer. She hopes that one day her innovative ideas will be applied in practice even if she is away from the lab. Lidiya loves to travel and has lived in many countries. She is still looking for a place to settle down with her young daughter. Lidiya is thrilled to be a part of the Scientista bloggers team, and loves being able to connect with wonderful female scientists at all stages of their careers, while writing about science and life.




Comments? Leave them below!

1 Comment
Robin Selinger link
3/25/2018 07:42:45 pm

Thanks very much for your thoughtful essay!

I am a female/age mid-50's physicist and serve as a full prof at a public university in the midwest-- and also as faculty advisor to our local chapter of Scientistas.

In my view, feminism is about respecting personal choices, whether it's what clothing you wear, how you talk, who you love, whether to marry, whether to have kids, and if you do, whether to embrace the role of an at-home parent or work outside the home either full-time or part-time. No one can tell you there's a right way to be. You get to decide for yourself.

However each of us must be aware, our choices have consequences. This is also true of wardrobe choices.

When a young scientist asks for advice about what to wear e.g. for a conference presentation, I suggest that they choose a look that falls within one or two standard deviations of the mean for the venue and social setting. My reason is simple: I want the audience to focus on the science in the presentation and not be distracted by the fashion.

Because distraction is a significant danger. Great fashion and good looks can easily grab the audience's attention and take it away from the science.

For example, some years ago a brilliant young female PhD student from our own department gave a talk at our weekly research seminar. She was dressed in a short miniskirt that looked really great. If she had not been born a brilliant physicist she could easily have chosen a career as a fashion model.

Here's the problem: years later, everyone remembers the gorgeous outfit. No one remembers much else about the presentation.

This is not just a woman's problem. A man can fall into this trap just as easily. Anything a little outside the norm for the setting in terms of clothing, jewelry, shoes, grooming, accessories can be a potential distraction. An atypical haircut (e.g. a purple Mohawk) or long hair would be pretty unusual for a guy here in the midwest. Though in San Francisco it might blend right in.

Sociologically we as a society have a general set of guidelines about what range of clothing styles is considered appropriate in any given venue. Standards shift over time and vary with setting, region of the country, age group and ethnicity of participants. A bikini is fine on the beach but not okay at the office. A tuxedo is perfect for a wedding but would be considered odd for a parent-teacher conference. Fashions change with time, controlled by everyone and no one, like a Ouija board.

For lab scientists, we also have safety regulations around clothing and hair. In the lab, close-toed shoes are required, no exceptions. Long hair must be tied back. Flammable clothing is particularly dangerous. Women have lost their lives (Yale, UCLA) because of such issues.

To avoid distracting my students when I lecture, I always avoid wearing dangling earrings. I don't want the flash of swaying jewelry to take the students' attention for one microsecond away from the physics we are discussing. And though I am rapidly moving into the senior citizen demographic, I make sure not to dress conservatively when I'm teaching. I'll happily wear shorts and a low cut shirt to the park but never to the classroom.

So wear that eye-catching, distracting outfit to a party, to a restaurant, to the theater. When you're in the work setting, stay within two standard deviations of average so people who interact with you won't spend all their time thinking about how you look.

As I said at the outset, you are free to wear distracting outfits if you want. No one is stopping you (unless you fail to abide by safety rules in lab, of course.) No one stopped Elle from bringing her cute dog to law school...just as no one stopped me from bringing my cute newborn baby to work with me to the office two days/week when I was a postdoc and adjusting to being a new mom. Even when I left the baby at home, I needed breaks to pump milk. I can only imagine people thought I was strange. Luckily I am a theorist so did not need to work in a lab where a baby would not be welcome.

Keep in mind though, if people are distracted by your outfit, or if they think you're crazy or eccentric for wearing (or doing) something out of the ordinary, it just creates a little extra challenge for you. It's your responsibility to get people to focus on what's really important: your science.

If you don't mind that extra challenge, go ahead, wear what you want. It's your privilege to abide by the community standard or push the envelope. Elle Woods chose to push it, and she succeeded.

Besides, if no one ever pushed the envelope, the standards would never change. Someone has to be first. Might as well be you!

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    July 2022
    July 2021
    December 2020
    April 2020
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    November 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    November 2014
    October 2013
    July 2013

    Categories

    All Amy Massack BiWeekly Roundup Danae Dodge Gabrielle-Ann Torre Indulekha Karunakaran Jeesoo Sohn Lauren Koenig Lidiya Angelova Melissa Bendayan Microsoft Molly Connell Nektaria Riso Nicole Hellessey Physics Poornima Peiris Robbin Koenig Sadaf Atarod Sarah Smith Shreya Challa Vijendra Agarwal Women In STEM Yolanda Lannquist

    RSS Feed


About

Mission  
Team


Connect

E-Newsletter
Facebook
Twitter
​
Instagram
Contact 


Press

All Press
Harvard Crimson
Harvard Gazette
Bostinnovation.com

Partner

Our Sponsors
Sponsorship Inquiries
​Partnership Inquiries
The Scientista Foundation, Inc. All Rights Reserved © 2011-2021 | Based in NY | contact@scientistafoundation.org
The Network for Pre-Professional Women in Science and Engineering
The Scientista Foundation is a registered 501(c)(3) -- Donate!

Photo used under Creative Commons from just_a_name_thingie